I just read this
article in the Star Tribune about expatriates living in Shanghai. I lived in Beijing during my sophomore year in college (1984-85) and China was a very different place, or least so I hear now. Our class of about 30 Americans from several Northeastern colleges took a mid-term trip to Shanghai. In the mid-80s, it still had its old charm of mostly 19th century foreign enclaves.
I realize that Shanghai has changed a lot in the past 20 years, and that it has become a financial and commercial powerhouse with loads of foreign investors clamoring to make money there. The article mentioned above just struck me as a throwback to the days of the Raj in India.
[They] live in a guarded compound with Belgian, Swedish, German and African neighbors, attend a church that bars local residents and pay $10 for a gallon of pasteurized milk from New Zealand.
When I was in China in the mid-80s a lot of things open to foreigners were indeed closed to the general population of Chinese. The exceptions were members of the Chinese Communist Party. They could enter foreign hotels and the Friendship store - a large department store that sold imported goods along with luxury goods produced in China.
Such is the life of Minnesota expatriates in Shanghai, arguably the most cosmopolitan city in the world -- coveted by businesspeople and adventure-seekers eager to experience an emerging economic superpower. For most, a stint in Shanghai can define one's career or life experience.
That doesn't sound like a cosmopolitan city from the viewpoint of the average Chinese citizen. It sounds more like the expats in this story are high rollers who get a chance at the good life. Granted the woman of the couple is learning Chinese, but will she use it to interact with people on a personal level?
My whole feeling of this article is that it is more of a promotion of our "values" abroad rather that a portrait of two people living in China.